Epson Ingrown Hair Extractor

Replace an employee by a student is a crime

The use of nursing students are increasing in most companies which could a priori appear as a positive practice. What's most commendable effect of allowing for future employees to put one foot in the company and thus improve their knowledge of the working world and, indeed, their employability? Until then, nothing wrong.

But the legislation stipulates that the trainee can not perform any regular tasks corresponding to a permanent job, whether for seasonal work or to meet a temporary increase in activity.
Use a trainee instead of an employee is in fact a criminal practice specified by a decree of 2006 which provides in Article 6 that "no training agreement can be made to replace an employee absence, suspension of his employment contract or dismissal, to run a regular task corresponding to a permanent job, to cope with a temporary increase in the activity of the company, for seasonal work ". The text is clear and unequivocal: intern in no case act as an employee to "small price". should be vigilant against the growing precariousness of employment: the Commission are being replaced by CSD themselves in competition with participants. There was the laundry that washed whiter than white and today we have employees cheaper flights. Everyone must be vigilant on the subject and reassemble the case as it may seem contentious.